fxgnosis
KZ flag
KZ · EN

Negative balance protection and the compensation scheme: what's the difference?

Updated July 9, 2026 · 20 articles

03If something goes wrong: protection and broker verification
This article was not written by a lawyer. The information is drawn from primary sources and double-checked, with links at the end, but a professional looking at your specific situation may say otherwise.
In short
  • NBP: the account doesn't go below zero. It protects against a debt to the broker, but not against losing the deposit.
  • The compensation scheme: payouts if the broker collapses. It doesn't cover trading losses.
  • In the EU, NBP is mandatory. At offshore entities it's a voluntary condition of the specific broker.
  • In the shortlist's offshore jurisdictions there are no compensation funds.

Negative balance protection

A strong gap can jump over the stop-out level, and the position closes with a minus on the account: formally that's the client's debt to the broker. NBP means the broker zeroes out such a minus at its own expense. In the EU, negative balance protection has been mandatory for retail accounts since the ESMA measures of 2018; at offshore companies it's a voluntary condition each broker decides for itself. At some brokers in the shortlist NBP is on by default: this is visible on the cards. What NBP doesn't do: it doesn't save the deposit within the account, and trading losses stay yours.

The compensation scheme

This is protection against a different disaster: the broker has gone bankrupt or hasn't returned client money. In strict jurisdictions state funds operate: up to £85,000 per client in the UK (FSCS), up to €20,000 in Cyprus (ICF), up to AUD 150,000 in Australia (CSLR). In the offshore jurisdictions under which clients from Kazakhstan are served there are no such funds: on a broker's bankruptcy there's no guaranteed reimbursement, and protection rests only on the requirement to keep client money separate from the company's money. Details for each jurisdiction: the Regulators page.

The private analogue for members of The Financial Commission: the commission's fund, up to €20,000 per complaint, and only in the situation where a member broker has refused to comply with a dispute ruling.

Who protects against what

SituationWhat covers it
Trading loss on your own tradesNothing. That's market risk
A minus on the account after a gapNBP, if the broker has it
A FinaCom member broker doesn't comply with a dispute rulingThe FinaCom fund, up to €20,000 per complaint
Broker bankruptcyThe compensation scheme, if one exists in the licence's jurisdiction
Sources
  1. ESMA: measures on CFDs (2018): mandatory NBP for retail accounts in the EU.
  2. The Financial Commission: Compensation Fund.
  3. The site's Regulators page: compensation schemes and limits for each jurisdiction.